|
23/March/2005 08:21 - Chicago
A couple weeks ago, an individual on one of the email lists I frequent said something like:
'I am a poet, and believe true poetry comes from the soul'.
This made me wonder about a few things...
What is a poet?
What is 'true poetry', and how can it be distinguished from poetry that is 'not true'?
What is 'the soul', and does everybody have one?
If a person doesn't have a soul, but they want to write poetry, can they, or will trying only result in the production of drivel, nonsense, or some other form of pointless verbiage?
No, I'm not trying to be a wise-ass, here... well... maybe just a
little teensy bit of a wise ass, but just for flavouring.
I've written a lot of articles/papers about this stuff over the
years... probably over 1,000 pages... most relating to easel painting and the visual arts. All of it is available for perusal in the 'Papers' section on my website -> http://www.robertwittig.com/
My 'best guess', is that 'being a poet' is pretty much like being a painter, writer of fiction, dancer, musician, composer, sculptor or practitioner in any field of the arts, and requires to some undefined degree:
1) 'The Knack'... the natural talent to excel, that makes some
people excellent musicians, other people excellent
mathematicians, and some people natural automobile mechanics.
2) 'The Skillset'... which is acquired by practice and study
only. Having the knack to be a great surgeon does not tell you
where to cut, and having the knack to be a great painter does not
tell you where to place the paint. Study and practice will,
though, over time.
3) 'The Desire'... which is a short way of saying the overwhelming desire to say something. No... not overwhelming desire... imperative need... to say something. I am guessing that this might be what is meant, by "comes from the soul", in the sentence that started me thinking.
In my own life I see a few things that relate to this:
When I was in my 20's, I took up painting, but nothing much came
of it at that time. I had the 'knack', but I did not have the
skillset, and I was too caught up in goofiness to focus myself,
and acquire the skillset. Also, I had what I now believe to be,
was a 'pseudo-desire' to be an 'artist'... to impress my friends,
to raise my status... bullshit like that.
What I didn't have, was sufficient life experience, so that I
might be capable of actually making any sort of solid observation
on the human condition... I was simply too immature.
By the time I was in my mid-40's, I had lived long enough to have
something solid to say on the human condition, but I was caught
up in owning a business, being husband and father, paying my
bills, etc., etc.
Then I had a stroke, and my datebook was wiped absolutely clean,
and I found myself on permanent disability.
The business I had started, and was earning my living at, was a
furniture finishing and woodworking business... I had, in fact,
taken the knack for painting I had felt 20 years before, and
pursued it in the 'applied arts', where 'The skillset' was
permitted to grow, and grow, and grow, but where I was forever
doing another person's bidding... painting their furniture, the
way they wanted it painted, which most of the time was clear or
coloured lacquer, maybe a little gold leaf, and occasionally, a
chance to produce a nice faux finish... but always, my work was
subject to another person's whim.
A couple years or so after the stroke, when I had reassembled
myself enough to think somewhat clearly, I went down into my
basement, where my tools had been moved after my business had
been sold off, and started painting on pieces of scrap wood and
other stuff, like the tops of old coffee tables, nightstands, etc.
This time, though, what I painted was what I wanted to paint.
After a while, people began buying what I was painting, and then
some people asked me to make paintings specifically for them...
they were going to tell me what to paint, and I was going to do
as I was told, and then if they liked the results... if I was a
good and obedient little 'paint monkey'... I would get paid...
same deal I had, running my furniture finishing business.
I said... 'Thanks, but no thanks'.
I would guess that this is the difference between 'true poetry'
(or painting), and 'not true' poetry... that if you are doing
another person's bidding, the work is 'not true'. It may be a
technical masterpiece, but it is saying what another person wants
said.
The individual who I paraphrased above also said something like:
'I believe that people who write poetry for none other than themselves, and are putting forth their emotion into it, are true poets. As for myself I'm a true poet in my eyes because I write for me and nobody else, and couldn't care less what anyone else thinks of it'.
This got me thinking, too, and I replied:
I can't honestly say the same for myself.
When I am at easel, I do my very, very best to forget about
whether or not other people will want to purchase my work, etc.,
because I know that letting such matters creep into the work does
the work a disservice, but I do not live in a vacuum, and I am
not a perfect person, so I am not able to entirely ignore what
other people think of my work.
Knowing what little I have learned in 56 years of living, I am
not sure that anyone can really, truly, completely divorce
themselves for the opinions (and imagined opinions) of their
peers, patrons, and society in general. Humans are a socially
bound species. I don't think we can ever totally escape that. I
also don't think that if we could, it would be a particularly
good idea, for either psyche, or the work one produced.
This individual also said:
'Poetry, as any form of art or self-expression, holds its meaning for the person who wrote it'.
...to which I replied...
I don't know about this. Poetry, creative writing, painting,
dance, music, sculpture... in my opinion, all of these pursuits
are social exercises... performances for an audience.
I know that for me, selling (or giving away) my work is just as
important as making it. I really cannot imagine painting a
picture, and being entirely pleased with it, and then tossing it
in a fire, without ever showing it to anyone.
My paintings will have one meaning for me, and different meanings
for the people who view them, sure, but 'self-expression'...
performing a play, or reading a poem, or playing a song... in an
empty room, not for practice, but never to be seen or heard by
another living human being... seems sort of pointless to me.
I'm not sure what 'art' is. I don't think anyone is, and I suspect that the more certain a person is about 'what art is', and what functions art performs for the human psyche... individually and collectively... the further off-base they are.
Science is unraveling all sorts of mysteries and secrets, large and small... but it seems they haven't made even a small dent in figuring out what-all the fine arts actually do.
Maybe this is one mystery, that human mind prefers to keep cloaked from itself, indefinitely.
Maybe 'just being human' is more important, than knowing what it means to 'be human', in all its gritty details.
Here's some poetry.
I'm a dog... arf!
But I'm not an obedient dog... grrrr!
-wittig 05
Written on RHEL3, using the vi-improved editor
Robert C Wittig
March 24, 2005
wittig@robertwittig.com
2004, Robert C Wittig. All rights reserved.
|